This program will provide a foundation of knowledge and understanding of the DRG system used as the structure for reimbursement under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Included in this will be a review of the DRG relative weights, case mix index and expected lengths of stay. Medical record coding will be explained in the context of how hospitals get reimbursed. This will be followed by a discussion of managed care and managed care contracting as well as the various managed care products currently on the market.
Also, included will be a discussion on bundled payments and what case management professionals need to know to assist their organizations in controlling cost and length of stay in a bundled payment environment where patients may access care and use resources at any touch point on the continuum.
A review of the state of the art in case management from both the acute care and community sides will also be discussed as well as the emerging trends that correlate directly with changes in health care reimbursement over time.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provides us with two Conditions of Participation that apply to the work of case management professionals. These include the Conditions of Participation for Discharge Planning and the Conditions of Participation for Utilization Review. This webinar will focus on these rules as they apply to the role of utilization review. In order for case management departments to be compliant with these regulations, RN and social work case managers must understand these ‘rules of the road’ for utilization review and work within their boundaries.
In this jam-packed program you will learn how to stream-line your utilization management process as well as understand the Conditions of Participation for Utilization Review and how they impact on your work as a case manager. We will discuss the differences between utilization review and utilization management. The process for incorporating medical necessity into the process of utilization management will be explained. This will be followed by a discussion of the compliance components for utilization review including the utilization management plan, the utilization management committee, Condition Code 44, and the two-midnight rule. How to incorporate the two-midnight rule into your utilization management process. Also explained will be the various types of clinical reviews performed by the case manager.
The various types of Hospital-Issued Notices of Non-Coverage (HINNs) will be described with examples of how they are used. You will learn whether or not your utilization management committee is effective and compliant.
Venue: Recorded Webinar
A hospital chargemaster is a comprehensive list of a hospital's products, procedures, and services. Everything from prescription drugs to supplies for diagnostic tests has a unique price listing in the chargemaster. Major components include revenue codes that reflect the site of service and applicable CPT/HCPCS codes that indicate the service provided/charged. Poor matches between these code sets may lead to distorted cost centers, lost revenue, charges bundled that should be separately reported and incomplete departmental charging. Webinar’s Goals Understand chargemaster code functions Understand revenue leakage resulting from poor chargemaster structure Understand why correct departmental charging is vital to revenue integrity Appropriate training for charge entry staff Billing attention to posted charges Who Should Attend Chargemaster Maintenance Staff Compliance staff Billers Coders Revenue Cycle Managers & Staff Risk Management Charge entry staff
Areas Covered A major component of successful revenue management is accurate charging for services provided. Charges must be identified, posted timely and completely. Hospital charge capture is typically handled by the department that provided the service. Professional charges may be posted by the provider. In either case, the function may be a low administrative priority with little to limited training for charging activities. Coordination between departments may not be established. Accountability for correct charging may be minimal. There may be no formal policies or baseline controls for correct charge capture. Different systems may be used for charging and reconciliation An effective charge audit can identify lost revenue opportunities Webinar’s Goals Understand the importance of accurate charge capture Tips for charge review Departmental charge capture errors & omissions Revenue leakage resulting from charging errors Reduce non-compliance exposure Improvement of operational efficiency Enhance patient satisfaction Key Points Why Errors Occur Multiple departments entering charges Charge master may be incorrect or incomplete Error in number of units selected Error in item selection Inactive charge New service not added Incorrect revenue code/cost center System conversions Overreliance on claims scrubber Target Audience Physicians Practice managers Medical assistants Nurses Compliance staff Billers Coders Revenue Cycle Risk Management
Is your practice audit safe? Do you have compliance risks? The first issue will be where do you start to determine your risk. Some key questions to ask: Is this a compliance or educational audit? Is this a baseline audit or a more focused audit? Do you have an internal audit team or do you need to hire external auditors? The type of audit will determine where to start, how many services to review and the type of service(s) to be audited. Is there a time limitation? Has there been a previous audit that showed issues that need attention? Have there been internal or external complaints that need to be reviewed? This webinar will discuss best practices and all of these issues as well as how to determine a pull and how many services should be included in the audit. Webinar Objectives How to determine the scope/sample of the audit Government suggestions for auditing. The difference between a concurrent versus retrospective audit. What is the difference in an educational audit and a compliance audit What is an attorney client privilege audit. How does the type of practice change the audit focus. What are the risk areas depending on the type of physician practice. Webinar Highlights Auditing for office services Incomplete documentation for office ancillary services such as injections, cerumen impaction removal, nebulizer treatments etc “Incident to” Initial, subsequent hospital and observation services. Shared care Auditing for surgical and specialty practices Modifier usage Who Should Attend Office managers Compliance team and officers Coders Providers Denial management staff
The session will provide an overview of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and review what it prohibits, as well as review the Statute’s available safe harbors. It will also show how violation of the AKS can raise FCA concerns, and it will provide an assessment of enforcement activities, showing how participants may be at risk. In addition, the session will review recent cases and show how they potentially impact participants. We will provide an in-depth review of the AKS, focusing on what is prohibited under the Act and what the exceptions are. We will also review the case law, particularly the early case law that sets the stage and basis for how the courts interpret the law. Since one of the exceptions to enforcement under the Act is regulations promulgated by the Secretary, the “safe harbors,” payment practices that will not be subject to criminal prosecution and that will not provide a basis for civil monetary penalties or exclusion from the Medicare or Medicaid programs, we will examine these safe harbors, particularly those more frequently used, to show how protection from enforcement can be achieved. Specifically, we will review the investment, space and equipment rental, personal services/management contracts, and physician recruitment safe harbors. In addition, we will discuss the OIG’s Joint Venture Advisory Opinion, where a hospital expands into a related service line by contracting with an existing provider of that service. The OIG has significant problems with such an arrangement. We will also discuss the recent advisory opinion by the OIG regarding Physician-Owned Entities. OIG views PODs as inherently suspect under the AKS because the opportunity for a referring physician to earn a profit, including through an investment in an entity for which he or she generates business, could constitute illegal remuneration under the AKS. Finally, the webinar will review various cases to show how easy it is to run afoul of the Statute, and how the courts view compliance with it. Who Can Benefit Hospital executives, particularly CEOs, COOs, CFOs, CNOs, and CMOs; Nursing home executives; Physicians; Physician practice managers; and Other healthcare provider executives. Target Audience Hospital executives, particularly CEOs, COOs, CFOs, CNOs, and CMOs; Nursing home executives; Physicians; Physician practice managers; and Other healthcare provider executives. Background The AKS is currently the focus of law enforcement officials. The Statute provides that the offer or payment, as well as the solicitation or receipt, of “any remuneration” in exchange for referrals of any good, facility, service, or item for which payment may be made in whole or in part under Medicare/Medicaid is prohibited. Recent cases and/or enforcement actions involving the AKS, violation of which has been held to be the basis of an action under the Federal False Claims Act, (“FCA”) raise serious concerns regarding compliance issues with hospital, physician practices and other healthcare entities. Recoveries under the FCA are at an all-time high, and the percentage of actions involving healthcare organizations has been increasing at exponential rates. Areas Covered in this Presentation Federal Civil Anti-Kickback Statute, Safe Harbors providing protection under the AKS, Enforcement activities involving the AKS, The OIG’s Joint Venture Advisory Opinion, The OIG’s advisory opinion regarding Physician-Owned Entities, and The anti-fraud provisions of the Affordable Care Act.